CRITICAL — exmox · US, IT
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U08LV0GL8G0> can you help us with finalized numbers for *August* and *September* so we can invoice?
Since we were paused, it slipped my mind and I did not invoice for August yet. If I had invoiced on time, it would've been due yesterday per Net 30 terms. Do we need to stick to an additional Net 30 since we are invoicing now, or could we set an earlier due date? Thanks!" (t=2026-10-02 19:37 UTC). Directive d_26690f7ec4 is 'ambiguous'.
🚨 NEEDS RESPONSE — no team reply yet
Suggested responder: Carson (finance/billing) — loop in Ashley if she's already engaged
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] response has been made bids have been cut for 181 and 182 to $6, android is also off and link for android was paused in the early morning c
• [resolved from dashboard] US traffic has been completely paused, there is a global announcement in the announcements channel of the discord server as well as in
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U08LV0GL8G0> can you help us with finalized numbers for *August* and *September* so we can invoice? Since we were p…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
CRITICAL — almedia · freecash, sweepstakes US, IT, AT, BE
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U06BTV7L1SP>,
We disagree with this chargeback and cannot accept it as issued.
We have spoken to the affiliates whose traffic is in question and they explicitly deny any association with this landing page. Additionally, we have spent all day investigating this ourselves and are unable to find any indication that these accusations have any standing. If you are going to make accusations of this severity against us, we at least deserve to be provided with evidence. A few things that stand out to us:
*1. Nothing ties this traffic to us.* The Reddit post you cited contains no association to us, and actually precedes the traffic in question. Please send us any specific click IDs, corresponding network requests, landing page URLs, screenshots, artifacts, or general evidence from your records that indicate any association to the funnel in question, with timestamps.
*2. This angle was running elsewhere long before Sep 29.* These posts show the same pop-up and screen-time-to-cash creative from earlier dates:
• <https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTok/comments/1t9us20/earn_while_scroll_pop_up/|reddit.com/r/TikTok/…/earn_while_scroll_pop_up>
• <https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTok/comments/1ugsgcx/screen_time_to_cash_creator/|reddit.com/r/TikTok/…/screen_time_to_cash_creator>
• <https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1wpdrvl/had_this_pop_up_in_the_middle_of_an_interesting/|reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/…/had_this_pop_up_in_the_middle_of_an_interesting>
The last one was reported on a day we sent under $500 in US traffic. Whoever is running this has been doing it for weeks through other networks.
*3. <http://playrwd.com|playrwd.com>.* Attached is the full click export for every click in our logs from <http://playrwd.com|playrwd.com>. It is a domain owned by affiliate ID #46, who's traffic is not even in question here, as they have not ran traffic to Freecash in over a month. Additionally, this domain has never sent any clicks to Freecash, it is exclusively used for sweepstakes offers. We don't understand where the "$1,000 for three offers" claim came from or why it's tied to us.
*4. Mike's message was a question, not a confirmation.* He asked whether a "screentime to cash" angle was allowed because he'd seen it scaling on other networks. He also said in the same message that he hadn't seen the actual ads. We asked because we check before running anything, not because we were already running it.
*5. The volume drop was our doing.* We raised this angle to you ourselves, and we paused the affiliate in question entirely so we could conduct an internal investigation to ensure all materials were compliant. This is our standard internal policy, as we have zero tolerance for uncompliant behaviors. That is why volume was stopped. And as aforementioned, the investigation returned with no indication that any materials used were uncompliant or even similar to the ones we stand accused of using.
Given this information, the $141,252.50 chargeback you have proposed is not supported by what you've sent. Going forward, we're happy to share new sub-publishers and sub1s before they get traffic, and confirm creative angles in writing if desired, but we are formally requesting reconsideration and a presentation of evidence on this matter." (t=2026-10-07 01:23 UTC). Directive d_cfd57aa4ac is 'ambiguous'.
🚨 NEEDS RESPONSE — no team reply yet
Suggested responder: Carson (finance/billing) — loop in Ashley if she's already engaged
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash', 'sweepstakes'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U06BTV7L1SP>, We disagree with this chargeback and cannot accept it as issued. We have spoken to the affiliates who…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
HIGH — almedia · IT, BE
advertiser instructed: "I can pause all traffic rn, but pls take a look into this. Idk if it’s meant to be like that or not <@U02B1BEMBEC> <@U06BTV7L1SP>" (t=2026-09-06 13:42 UTC). Directive d_e1164a65c6 is 'new'.
🚨 NEEDS RESPONSE — no team reply yet
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Exposure: $0.00
Recommended: pause the offer(s) in IT, BE; notify 6 uncontacted affiliate(s). Confirm?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
HIGH — prograd · traffic
Salvo instructed: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0>
1. Has the traffic been split to the 2 campaigns? Still not seeing the change on my side <https://progradworkspace.slack.com/archives/C0ASMBSH4HJ/p1788167788147039|https://progradworkspace.slack.com/archives/C0ASMBSH4HJ/p1788167788147039>
2. regarding quality feedback
• #284: quality is not good enough yet, we need tot target 2.5% ROAS D0 or I'll need to pause
• #109: any news on him getting back live?
• is there any new test that is gonna start?" (t=2026-09-08 12:27 UTC). Directive d_61abc44269 is 'new'.
🚨 NEEDS RESPONSE — no team reply yet
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Read as: stop offer(s) in traffic? Wording isn't explicit — confirm the intended action/scope before anyone acts.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
HIGH — tiktok · AT
Veronika Breslaw instructed: "Hi <@U0AB21E0WG0> and team,
We’re excited to introduce *Smart+ Bid Protection*,limited-time, automated performance guarantee for eligible Smart+ campaigns using Cost Cap, Minimum ROAS, or Target ROAS bidding.
*Why you’ll love Smart+ Bid Protection*
• *Performance Safety Net*: TikTok automatically covers the gap with ad credits if your eligible campaign exceeds 1.2x your CPA or ROAS target.
For example, if your Cost Cap is $10, the protection threshold is $12. If an eligible campaign’s actual CPA exceeds $12, TikTok may provide ad credits covering the qualifying spend above that threshold.
• *Scale with Confidence*: Protect your investment while testing new creatives or scaling budgets, even during competitive seasonal peaks.
• *Operational Stability*: Reduce "panic-pauses" and manual tweaks—protection gives your campaigns the room they need to stabilize and optimize.
• *Seamless Automation*: No applications or paperwork—qualifying credits are calculated and injected directly into your ad account.
*The Rules (Key Limitations)*
• *Supported Setups Only*: Applies to specific Smart+ objectives and bidding strategies Cost Cap, ROAS.
• *thresholds Matter*: Campaigns must run at least 3 days.
• *Stay Stable*: Manual bid changes, budget cuts, pausing, or low account balance may disqualify you for the day.
• *Credits Only*: Compensation is issued as non-cash ad credits within 10-12 business days of the qualified day.
*Best Practices for Success*
• *Launch Right*: Verify your campaign objective and bidding strategy are supported before you go live.
• *Maintain Momentum*: Keep budgets and bids stable; let the algorithm learn without interruptions.
• *Fund Your Account*: Ensure you have sufficient balance to avoid disqualification due to budget stops." (t=2026-09-24 11:10 UTC). Directive d_929c5bccdd is 'ambiguous'.
🚨 NEEDS RESPONSE — no team reply yet
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] confirmed with udi that account was able to spend; plan to have a few testing campaigns up to get the account through the learning phase fo
• [handled / approved] campaign launched on udi account, spend is slow but will monitor performance
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U0AB21E0WG0> and team, We’re excited to introduce *Smart+ Bid Protection*,limited-time, automated performance guara…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
HIGH — exmox · empfohlen traffic
Max Baturin instructed: "<@U0AB21E0WG0> hi! Below are the IDs I'd like to restart, max rate we can offer is $6 CPI on Empfohlen, with a total cap of 600 FAs/day (~1200 regs):
182
181
157
D3 ROAS target 120%, D3 iROAS target is 85%, the focus is on D3 ROAS
Campaign name - Mabac_IOS_Empfohlen_WW_CPI_Affiliate_shmp
Your call on how to split the cap between publishers; please focus on those who can launch the campaigns asap
LMK your thoughts :pray:" (t=2026-09-29 08:04 UTC). Directive d_19efc92e2a is 'ambiguous'.
⏳ awaiting advertiser reply (context — not your action yet)
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] this is an alert webhook message from exmox that is routed to our top 3 empfohlen affiliates (179, 181, 182) changes have been made on 08/1
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['empfohlen'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U0AB21E0WG0> hi! Below are the IDs I'd like to restart, max rate we can offer is $6 CPI on Empfohlen, with a total cap…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · freecash IT, BE
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U0AV545EN3D>, are we able to whitelist this account for activity through Reco Social? I'm currently scaling that offer and seeing good performance on it compared to Freecash, it would be much easier to pivot larger amounts of spend that way." (t=2026-08-14 16:49 UTC). Directive d_8fee47691c is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [handled / approved] confirmed with udi that account was able to spend; plan to have a few testing campaigns up to get the account through the learning phase fo
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U0AV545EN3D>, are we able to whitelist this account for activity through Reco Social? I'm currently scaling that of…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · FR
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U06BTV7L1SP>, our main publisher on FR the past few days is looking to scale up on the lower CPA, can we get cap bumped for them?" (t=2026-08-17 02:24 UTC). Directive d_8c6e14aeee is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U06BTV7L1SP>, our main publisher on FR the past few days is looking to scale up on the lower CPA, can we get cap bu…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — mabacxprograd · traffic
Salvo instructed: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0>
quality looks bad for #188
• there were 145 signups and 0 purchases
• activation rate is also extremely low: users who sign up and start an offer
*Please cut the signup payout to $4 for this pub*
Thanks" (t=2026-08-17 07:56 UTC). Directive d_e61ef9fe9a is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Read as: stop offer(s) in traffic? Wording isn't explicit — confirm the intended action/scope before anyone acts.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · AT, BE
Max Baturin instructed: "Hi <@U0AB21E0WG0> hi <@U09U4TK8QCW>
Hope all goes well. Quick update on the cost confusion: to avoid discrepancies in the future, I gave you permission to use the cost upload section in AppsFlyer. The cost corrections must be done at least twice a week - Mon and Fri
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dZf3KJHXGYxu7eMn8psPt7FSu4xuNcmOv7WwaW3i-W0/edit?gid=1938847974#gid=1938847974|Here> is the template file you can use.
<https://support.appsflyer.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002516838-Import-cost-data|Here> are the instructions." (t=2026-08-17 10:40 UTC). Directive d_9770b28004 is 'ambiguous'.
⏳ awaiting advertiser reply (context — not your action yet)
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] resolved with meeting + new actioned proposal
• [resolved from dashboard] US traffic has been completely paused, there is a global announcement in the announcements channel of the discord server as well as in
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U0AB21E0WG0> hi <@U09U4TK8QCW> Hope all goes well. Quick update on the cost confusion: to avoid discrepancies in th…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
mediumalmedia · FR, IT, ES, NL, SEno $ exposure · 0 alert(s) · seen 2026-10-11T00:43
MEDIUM — almedia · FR, IT, ES, NL, SE
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "> Hi team! Unfortunately, the traffic quality on Aug 16 didn't reach our targets, so we have to adjust the CPA for the following segments:
> *By country:*
> | Country | New CPA |
> | --- | --- |
> | SE | $6.25 |
> | NL | $14.25 |
> | FR | $9.00 |
> | IT | $9.25 |
> | ES | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> *By sub:*
> | Sub | New CPA |
> | --- | --- |
> | 46_camp_1786499993246_rughyxo | $9.50 |
> | 182_mt | $5.00 |
> | 182_vv | $9.00 |
> | 257_ | $6.75 |
> | 179_sn | $10.25 |
> | 46_camp_1786511822437_658hmuo | $5.75 |
> | 182_ev | $7.50 |
> | 199_3 | $5.00 |
> | 181_el | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> | 113_camp_1786906084414_ao9fdfi | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> | 212_ | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> | 202_ | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> Please pause the segments marked accordingly until further notice. Could you confirm the new rates can go live today? Thanks!" (t=2026-08-17 11:56 UTC). Directive d_bfdcb413fe is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on FR/IT/ES/NL/SE meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — mabacxprograd · freecash AT
Salvo instructed: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0>, still 0 purchases. Please keep the cap for this pub *#188* at 50 conversions/day. So that I can give him a few more days to test
As of now only thing I see improving is activation rate, but 0 purchases. Is he working on Freecash as well? How is he doing there?
Thanks" (t=2026-08-18 08:23 UTC). Directive d_805b6b1e5e is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0>, still 0 purchases. Please keep the cap for this pub *#188* at 50 conversions/day. So that I can give…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
mediumalmedia · US, DE, FR, IT, ES, PL, NL, SEno $ exposure · 0 alert(s) · seen 2026-10-11T00:43
MEDIUM — almedia · US, DE, FR, IT, ES, PL, NL, SE
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "> Hi team! Unfortunately, the traffic quality on Aug 17 didn't reach our targets, so we have to adjust the CPA for the following segments:
> *By country*
> | Country | New CPA |
> |---|---|
> | US | $9.00 |
> | NL | $12.25 |
> | SE | $11.50 |
> | IT | $7.75 |
> | ES | $6.50 |
> | DE | $6.00 |
> | PL | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> | FR | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> *By sub*
> | Sub | New CPA |
> |---|---|
> | 179_sn | $6.50 |
> | 182_pe | $6.00 |
> | 181_ni | $4.50 |
> | 179_hm | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> | 216_ | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> | 199_3 | :double_vertical_bar: pause |
> Please pause the segments marked accordingly until further notice. Could you confirm the new rates can go live today? Thanks!" (t=2026-08-18 08:57 UTC). Directive d_e4e32cfc12 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on US/DE/FR/IT/ES/PL/NL/SE meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · teststar PL, IT, ES, AT, BE
advertiser instructed: "Good morning Mabac Media team! :wave:
We're scoping a possible expansion of *teststar* (currently FR-only) into a few new European markets: *Italy, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, and Romania*.
Could you share your rough, ballpark view on what your network could realistically deliver in each of these countries -- *daily install volume* and expected *CPI (USD)*? Even a wide range is genuinely useful at this stage, we're building an early sizing model and want to compare it against real partner input, not just our own guesses.
No rush at all -- sometime this week would be great. Thanks so much!" (t=2026-08-18 12:50 UTC). Directive d_237853f80a is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] this is an alert webhook message from exmox that is routed to our top 3 empfohlen affiliates (179, 181, 182) changes have been made on 08/1
• [resolved from dashboard] adjustments have been made to empfohlen traffic on 08/11 testerup is completely paused at this point; asked stuart about the validity
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['teststar'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Good morning Mabac Media team! :wave: We're scoping a possible expansion of *teststar* (currently FR-only) into a few ne…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — atargrowth · IT, BE
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U074NHTKAEA>, our main publisher is in the process of testing some new creatives to get the advertiser ROAS back to where it was in July and we have some new sources that’ll be testing in the coming few days - I’ll have ID 6 cut volume in the meantime. Were you able to get the D0-D7 KPIs calculated for advertiser ROAS?
For full transparency, the way most of our pubs run TikTok campaigns, it’s somewhat of a challenge to optimize towards D7 as campaigns are swapped daily or every few days, which is likely why we’re seeing higher values for your ROAS (D0)." (t=2026-08-18 15:24 UTC). Directive d_294fd90466 is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] cap increased to 15K on gravypass, will get more sources on it to get advertiser ROAS up for additional cap increase, otherwise kevin's tra
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Exposure: $0.00
Recommended: pause the offer(s) in IT, BE; notify 6 uncontacted affiliate(s). Confirm?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — mabacxprograd · freecash AT
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U0AS0HW2X4L>, I'm speaking with the publisher now to get traffic active again!
He is working with Freecash and Reco Social at the moment, quality is looking fine on those offers so far.
I'll speak to a few more of our affiliates to get them testing, would you prefer that we test with the lower payout or the $8 for a day to see quality?" (t=2026-08-18 16:27 UTC). Directive d_a62af45b24 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-💤, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U0AS0HW2X4L>, I'm speaking with the publisher now to get traffic active again! He is working with Freecash and Reco…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — mabacxprograd · IT, AT
advertiser instructed: "Let's keep $4 *per signup* only for #188, given the performance
all others can test at $5 *per signup*
*it is not CPI, it is per signup just to make sure.* Thank you" (t=2026-08-19 08:16 UTC). Directive d_7193b1ecd8 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Let's keep $4 *per signup* only for #188, given the performance all others can test at $5 *per signup* *it is not CPI, i…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · FR
advertiser instructed: "CPA for France is still not $8.
Maybe makes sense to pause for now." (t=2026-08-23 08:06 UTC). Directive d_e008b13a12 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] resolved via julia's message that our reporting is correct and what should be invoiced on
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on FR meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · freecash US, IT
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "Hi team, we identified a clear policy violation in the following landing page:
<https://play-handpicked-games.lovable.app/start|https://play-handpicked-games.lovable.app/start>
<https://freecash.com/|https://freecash.com/>
?utm_source=mabacmedia
&utm_medium=cpa
&utm_campaign=FC_MABAC_T1_APP_RON_US_CPA_19_11_2025
&click_id=<>
&sub1=182_ev
&sub2=182
&sub4=
The page advertises specific hourly earnings of €26/hour and €22/hour.
Our Partner Advertising Guidelines explicitly prohibit referencing specific earnings figures or hourly rates that are not guaranteed by Freecash.
Please pause this landing page and all creatives directing traffic to it immediately, and confirm once this has been done. Before relaunching the campaign, please send us the updated landing page for approval." (t=2026-08-24 07:16 UTC). Directive d_66627dba02 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on US/IT freecash meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · US
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U08LV0GL8G0>, wanted to follow up on the above - the cost files have been uploaded with full amounts for June/July, let me know if anything else is needed for us to complete these pending invoices." (t=2026-08-24 18:27 UTC). Directive d_2759e9a3ab is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] response has been made bids have been cut for 181 and 182 to $6, android is also off and link for android was paused in the early morning c
• [resolved from dashboard] US traffic has been completely paused, there is a global announcement in the announcements channel of the discord server as well as in
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U08LV0GL8G0>, wanted to follow up on the above - the cost files have been uploaded with full amounts for June/July,…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · US
advertiser instructed: "Good morning, Mabac Media team! :sunny:
:moneybag: *SPEND THIS MONTH*
$179,236 of $465,000 plan (38.5%)
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░
Remaining to reach plan: $285,764
:chart_with_upwards_trend: *REGISTRATIONS THIS MONTH*
18,408 of ~48,628 plan (37.9%)
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░
Remaining to reach plan: ~30,220
Target: iROAS2 ≥110%. A quiet week for this partner — spend in this week's mature D3 window came in well under our reporting threshold despite strong MTD pacing, so there's nothing to call on scale/reduce/pause this cycle.
Ping us anytime with questions!" (t=2026-08-25 08:16 UTC). Directive d_30aab4d792 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] adjustments have been made to empfohlen traffic on 08/11 testerup is completely paused at this point; asked stuart about the validity
• [handled / approved] this is an alert webhook message from exmox that is routed to our top 3 empfohlen affiliates (179, 181, 182) changes have been made on 08/1
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on US meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hey <@U0AE2DJVABU> is Invoice #093 expected to land today?" (t=2026-08-25 15:10 UTC). Directive d_438c9b2575 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] resolved via julia's message that our reporting is correct and what should be invoiced on
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0AE2DJVABU> is Invoice #093 expected to land today?". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hey I know a lot of our publishers have paused currently as they still haven't been paid for almost 2 weeks now. We still haven't received Invoice #093 which was expected on Monday" (t=2026-08-27 13:57 UTC). Directive d_213fc6e35c is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] resolved via julia's message that our reporting is correct and what should be invoiced on
What proves it:
• 7 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙, 280-jsnaff-💤
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey I know a lot of our publishers have paused currently as they still haven't been paid for almost 2 weeks now. We stil…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · IT
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U0AV545EN3D>, I've set up the pixel and am currently testing new campaigns - performance has been pretty OK so scale should increase in the coming days and spend along with it." (t=2026-08-31 07:45 UTC). Directive d_c154dea2ba is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 7 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙, 280-jsnaff-💤
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U0AV545EN3D>, I've set up the pixel and am currently testing new campaigns - performance has been pretty OK so scal…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · traffic
advertiser instructed: "I'm estimating with current metrics around $500-$1000 spend daily once I've finished testing; the offer itself has limited cap on our network but we have a new structure with them coming this week that will allow me to spend more. I'll let you know when I plan to scale up more concretely once testing is all done!" (t=2026-08-31 08:15 UTC). Directive d_2590b3f94a is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] confirmed with udi that account was able to spend; plan to have a few testing campaigns up to get the account through the learning phase fo
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 7 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙, 280-jsnaff-💤
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "I'm estimating with current metrics around $500-$1000 spend daily once I've finished testing; the offer itself has limit…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — prograd · US, GB, IT
Salvo instructed: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0>
1. I am finally seeing some traffic :slightly_smiling_face: However most of it is not getting to quality target: the only showing better potential was the pub #109 but I see he paused the campaign, why?
2. are we testing only UK or also US?
I would suggest the following: we split traffic into 2 campaigns - one is for testing all the base campaign and the other one is for increasing payout whenever we start to see better performance
• Base camapign paid $4 per signup `PR_MABAC_APP_IOS_US_CPA_SIGNUP_T0_31_08_2026` `PR_MABAC_APP_AOS_US_CPA_SIGNUP_T0_31_08_2026`
• T1 campaign paid $5 per signup
`PR_MABAC_APP_IOS_US_CPA_SIGNUP_T1_31_08_2026` `PR_MABAC_APP_AOS_US_CPA_SIGNUP_T1_31_08_2026`
◦ on this campaign for now only site ID #109 is allowed
What do you think?" (t=2026-08-31 09:16 UTC). Directive d_e1e8c147fa is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 7 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙, 280-jsnaff-💤
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0> 1. I am finally seeing some traffic :slightly_smiling_face: However most of it is not getting to qual…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U0AV545EN3D> just approved! Spend seems slow today :sweat_smile:
Let's discuss further plans later today, thank you for the meeting invite!" (t=2026-08-31 14:33 UTC). Directive d_244f4a70c8 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 7 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate-💤, 79-uberaff-💤, 96-afftune-michal-ingier-🌙, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd-🌙, 175-merceaff-💤, 254-affij17-🌙, 280-jsnaff-💤
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U0AV545EN3D> just approved! Spend seems slow today :sweat_smile: Let's discuss further plans later today, thank you…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — atargrowth · AT
advertiser instructed: "Hey <@U074NHTKAEA> just confirming that we're still using the gSheet as source of truth for billing data before I invoice?
And also, would you ever consider speeding up billing terms to a Semimonthly Net 15 (1st and 15th) arrangement? I understand you're facing long float times as well but wanted to float the idea as our main pub #6 has confided that he is running out of funds for adspend and may potentially have to cut back some volume, or at least not increase further :sweat_smile:" (t=2026-09-02 22:28 UTC). Directive d_eaa72fac86 is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [handled / approved] cap increased to 15K on gravypass, will get more sources on it to get advertiser ROAS up for additional cap increase, otherwise kevin's tra
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
Recommended: pause the offer(s) in AT; notify 6 uncontacted affiliate(s). Confirm?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — atargrowth · traffic
Adam Lovallo instructed: "totally cool if they need to cut back though that's entirely fiar" (t=2026-09-03 14:20 UTC). Directive d_a98bf0ff2b is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] cap increased to 15K on gravypass, will get more sources on it to get advertiser ROAS up for additional cap increase, otherwise kevin's tra
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Read as: stop offer(s) in traffic? Wording isn't explicit — confirm the intended action/scope before anyone acts.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
mediumalmedia · FR, US, GB, DE, IT, BE, NLno $ exposure · 0 alert(s) · seen 2026-10-11T00:43
MEDIUM — almedia · FR, US, GB, DE, IT, BE, NL
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "Hey team, <@U09UAG54B4L> <@U0AB21E0WG0> please pause publishers `sefcshop3` and `usfcen3shop` and limit GB to 5k daily spend till we get the proper quality. Also France does not perform.
Also please scale DE, NL and US as it performs well atm.
Please keep your eye on the quality and in case the quality is below the target CPA & spend per country / sub should be decreased. So far we see lack of actions about GB the country's been underperfomring for long time, but there is no spend decrease. Please take the actions more proactively." (t=2026-09-06 09:16 UTC). Directive d_44ca4298ce is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on FR/US/GB/DE/IT/BE/NL meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "<@U0AB21E0WG0> the day that I ran the overflow that we’re not getting paid for that traffic I’m only not getting paid for the overflow right but the rest under the cap is fine?" (t=2026-09-07 10:54 UTC). Directive d_6a6bece5da is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U0AB21E0WG0> the day that I ran the overflow that we’re not getting paid for that traffic I’m only not getting paid fo…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · traffic
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "Yes, we figured out 21- users considered for the quality analyzes but not for conversion number and CPA further calculation. but the cost & quality where correct" (t=2026-09-07 18:27 UTC). Directive d_4efa90fabf is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Yes, we figured out 21- users considered for the quality analyzes but not for conversion number and CPA further calculat…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — atargrowth · traffic
Adam Lovallo instructed: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0>!
I can't really sustain this amount of spend when the performance is so bad. Could we cap his iOS spend a, say, $1k a day until the ROAS & adv ROAS is better?" (t=2026-09-08 13:33 UTC). Directive d_15509a0332 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] cap increased to 15K on gravypass, will get more sources on it to get advertiser ROAS up for additional cap increase, otherwise kevin's tra
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0>! I can't really sustain this amount of spend when the performance is so bad. Could we cap his iOS spe…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — atargrowth · IT, BE
Adam Lovallo instructed: "If that isn't worth it from your POV (in terms of scale etc) I also totally understand and I'd be happy to pause for now and re-engage later.
Android is doing better from a ROAS perspective which is great, but it's our worst channel on terms of adv ROAS by 5-10x so that isn't really great either." (t=2026-09-08 13:35 UTC). Directive d_17dc6c8028 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] cap increased to 15K on gravypass, will get more sources on it to get advertiser ROAS up for additional cap increase, otherwise kevin's tra
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on IT/BE meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · GB, DE
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "<@U09UAG54B4L> need to cut GB to 5K er day till we get the quality :disappointed:
DE looks ok tho" (t=2026-09-08 18:07 UTC). Directive d_fc2401e36a is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on GB/DE meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · GB
advertiser instructed: "Hey. Okay sounds good, will cap GB to 5k/day :white_check_mark:" (t=2026-09-08 18:08 UTC). Directive d_574a070e8e is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey. Okay sounds good, will cap GB to 5k/day :white_check_mark:". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "You can't even reconcile postbacks with AF without a subscription. Or check post back history" (t=2026-09-08 21:03 UTC). Directive d_e74b706d10 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "You can't even reconcile postbacks with AF without a subscription. Or check post back history". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · traffic
Moritz Holländer instructed: "hey guys, we are way below target :disappointed: need to apply chargeback like that" (t=2026-09-09 12:37 UTC). Directive d_60fd52ede7 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "hey guys, we are way below target :disappointed: need to apply chargeback like that". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — appsamurai · IT, AT, BE
advertiser instructed: "Hey <@U09UAG54B4L>, how’s it going?
I had a look at the app and noticed that each campaign is offering a relatively high reward on install + start tutorial ($2–5). I think this could be contributing to the lower retention and ROAS, since users may be installing primarily to collect that initial reward without progressing much further into the funnel.
That being said, I wasn’t able to see our campaigns since they tend to fill their caps pretty quickly, so I’m not sure how the rewarding structure is set up specifically for ours.
Are you seeing higher retention on campaigns from other partners? My assumption would be that campaigns driving stronger progression likely have later events with meaningfully higher payouts than the install/start tutorial reward, giving users more incentive to continue.
Generally in this industry, we do not recommend rewarding users at all on install for this reason. While it can help drive initial volume and revenue, it can also lead to more short-lived campaign engagement rather than sustained progression and quality, since users have less incentive to continue if they can earn a meaningful reward simply by installing.
Curious to hear your thoughts and observations on how campaigns are performing for others and open to chatting over a call to discuss in depth as well!" (t=2026-09-09 14:43 UTC). Directive d_cf2d69e66c is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U09UAG54B4L>, how’s it going? I had a look at the app and noticed that each campaign is offering a relatively high…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · GB, AT
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "Hi team!
UK ran below the 2.5% D0 ROAS standard every day in September - 1.17% to 1.46%, never above 58% of target. Over the same days you scaled UK from $192 to $16,838 per day.
Scaling a market that is not hitting target is not something we can absorb.
*Chargeback: $41,362* on $90,349 of UK spend, 1–9 September.
— $34,423 against the 1–7 September invoice
— $6,939 against the current week, updated at close
Please pause UK for now.
cc <@U02B1BEMBEC>" (t=2026-09-10 14:43 UTC). Directive d_a0eec0b72d is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on GB/AT meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · GB
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U06BTV7L1SP> <@U02B1BEMBEC>, we completely understand the need for a chargeback and want to sincerely apologize for the situation. As of today, UK is paused and we are actively making adjustments to our publisher management to ensure that this doesn't happen again. We appreciate this partnership and are happy to talk through anything further if additional traffic adjustments are needed to meet your targets." (t=2026-09-10 15:53 UTC). Directive d_cdc7b438aa is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U06BTV7L1SP> <@U02B1BEMBEC>, we completely understand the need for a chargeback and want to sincerely apologize for…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · BE
advertiser instructed: "From a billing point of view, I assume the 1-7 September deduction will be applied against our currently issued Invoice #101 for 08/31-09/06?
Would you prefer I re-issue that invoice with the adjustment applied?
Apologies again for this matter and inconvenience.
cc <@U0AE2DJVABU> <@U07NYHN9TD4>" (t=2026-09-10 16:20 UTC). Directive d_cb9bea4807 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] resolved via julia's message that our reporting is correct and what should be invoiced on
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "From a billing point of view, I assume the 1-7 September deduction will be applied against our currently issued Invoice …". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · freecash IT
advertiser instructed: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> using fc's invoice dates:
mike is actually only responsible for 29K for last week (09/01-09/07), but idk how it would look to cb these smaller amounts" (t=2026-09-10 17:57 UTC). Directive d_553c35427d is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> using fc's invoice dates: mike is actually only responsible for 29K for last week (09/01-09/07), but idk …". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "This calculation is made to conduct a deduction that will normalize revenue to meet their quality threshold? Thus fairly distributing the losses?" (t=2026-09-10 18:51 UTC). Directive d_978eb820be is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "This calculation is made to conduct a deduction that will normalize revenue to meet their quality threshold? Thus fairly…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "212 should we chargeback 1k" (t=2026-09-10 19:02 UTC). Directive d_b9381845bb is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "212 should we chargeback 1k". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "38% on average from 09/01-09/10, but majority of spend was in the last 3 days" (t=2026-09-10 19:07 UTC). Directive d_e4c4c0c400 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "38% on average from 09/01-09/10, but majority of spend was in the last 3 days". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "theres companies that go and get the refund on your behalf and they take a cut" (t=2026-09-11 18:36 UTC). Directive d_6b448a5565 is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Read as: stop offer(s) in traffic? Wording isn't explicit — confirm the intended action/scope before anyone acts.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — atargrowth · traffic
Adam Lovallo instructed: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0> - Until we start hitting the ROAS goals could we limit our total spend to, say, $1 or $1.5k?" (t=2026-09-14 13:15 UTC). Directive d_bd3b6af35e is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] cap increased to 15K on gravypass, will get more sources on it to get advertiser ROAS up for additional cap increase, otherwise kevin's tra
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0AB21E0WG0> - Until we start hitting the ROAS goals could we limit our total spend to, say, $1 or $1.5k?". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "that works for me, we can go through the internal spend stuff rq as well" (t=2026-09-14 18:27 UTC). Directive d_ba3ef10df4 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "that works for me, we can go through the internal spend stuff rq as well". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · IT, BE
advertiser instructed: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> i guess it they just chose an arbitrary event ID to tie gross revenue to, the rest of the events will just be true/false or carry unweighted revenue values" (t=2026-09-14 22:18 UTC). Directive d_28afb7e058 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> i guess it they just chose an arbitrary event ID to tie gross revenue to, the rest of the events will jus…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · IT
Udi Ori - TikTok Affiliates instructed: "<@U0AB21E0WG0>
Can you increase the bid cap that will closer to the actual CPA in the TTAM?
I think it will help the ad group to start spending" (t=2026-09-15 09:20 UTC). Directive d_4b35314d93 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [handled / approved] campaign launched on udi account, spend is slow but will monitor performance
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U0AB21E0WG0> Can you increase the bid cap that will closer to the actual CPA in the TTAM? I think it will help the ad …". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · AT, BE
Max Baturin instructed: "<@U0AB21E0WG0>, hi! How are you doing?
We’re now ready to gradually restart your campaigns. We’d like to begin with ID 179 at a $6.50 CPI and a $1.5K daily cap.
Could you please check with the partner if that works for them?
The new campaign name will be Mabac_IOS_Empfohlen_WW_CPI_Affiliate_shmp" (t=2026-09-15 15:15 UTC). Directive d_7297f4aeaf is 'new'.
⏳ awaiting advertiser reply (context — not your action yet)
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] this is an alert webhook message from exmox that is routed to our top 3 empfohlen affiliates (179, 181, 182) changes have been made on 08/1
• [resolved from dashboard] adjustments have been made to empfohlen traffic on 08/11 testerup is completely paused at this point; asked stuart about the validity
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — appsamurai · IT
advertiser instructed: "Hey! Let me know what info you need from our end for billing setup and I'm happy to get it done." (t=2026-09-16 14:40 UTC). Directive d_360b09948f is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey! Let me know what info you need from our end for billing setup and I'm happy to get it done.". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · IT, AT
advertiser instructed: "Yeah spend seems a bit stuck, this ad group and all dupes are actually doing well and CPA is at the right bid, but even with goal-based optimization it's not spending :(" (t=2026-09-17 04:21 UTC). Directive d_6ca927e7b4 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [handled / approved] campaign launched on udi account, spend is slow but will monitor performance
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Yeah spend seems a bit stuck, this ad group and all dupes are actually doing well and CPA is at the right bid, but even …". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · traffic
Veronika Breslaw instructed: "I think since your CPA is actually good I would lift the bid cap to 0.3" (t=2026-09-17 09:15 UTC). Directive d_7c9f20aa79 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "I think since your CPA is actually good I would lift the bid cap to 0.3". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · traffic
Veronika Breslaw instructed: "Also we don't recommend using daily campaign budget but rather an ad group budget that will give you more control over the spend." (t=2026-09-17 09:36 UTC). Directive d_123440e96d is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [handled / approved] campaign launched on udi account, spend is slow but will monitor performance
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Also we don't recommend using daily campaign budget but rather an ad group budget that will give you more control over t…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — tiktok · traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U0BRLLK6FE0> thanks for taking a look! I'll increase the bid cap slightly and split test with an ABO to see if we can get more spend going." (t=2026-09-17 18:09 UTC). Directive d_988244a499 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U0BRLLK6FE0> thanks for taking a look! I'll increase the bid cap slightly and split test with an ABO to see if we c…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · IT, BE
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U09AKF7G7JA>, they should be able to push more traffic tomorrow - around 1K out of the 1.5K daily cap!
Also <@U08LV0GL8G0> would you be able to resend an invite to the Tableau dashboard? It seems Tableau made some updates and I'm no longer able to log in :smiling_face_with_tear:" (t=2026-09-17 21:23 UTC). Directive d_3e21153e5f is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the cap on IT/BE meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
mediumalmedia · freecash US, GB, CA, DE, IT, AT, BE, NL, SE, CHno $ exposure · 0 alert(s) · seen 2026-10-11T00:43
MEDIUM — almedia · freecash US, GB, CA, DE, IT, AT, BE, NL, SE, CH
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "Hi team,
We've reviewed Mabac performance on Freecash over the last ~5 weeks. Overall quality is currently below our target, and it has been for a while now. We'd like to work with you to turn this around, so here's where we stand.
*What's working, and where we're happy to see more volume:*
• `182`, especially `182_pe`, `182_mt` and `182_ev`
• `179`, especially `179_hm`, `179_aj` and `179_sn`
• `200`
• Geos: DE, NL, BE, CH, AT and US
*What needs to change:*
• Please pause `125`, `169` and `292`. They've been below target for several weeks with no improvement.
• Please pause `182_zm`.
• `181_el` is below target and currently getting the most volume. Please reduce it and shift that volume to the better-performing sub1s above.
• `209` is new, and early quality is weak. Please keep it at low volume until it proves itself.
• Please cut GB, IT, CA and SE. These geos have been consistently below target.
We'd also ask that any new sub1s are tested at small volume first, before scaling.
Thanks!" (t=2026-09-25 07:52 UTC). Directive d_4eedf323f1 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Is the stop on US/GB/CA/DE/IT/AT/BE/NL/SE/CH freecash meant for ALL affiliates or only a specific source? Recommended interpretation: global.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · IT
advertiser instructed: "but ppl tell me they send also revenue events and I thought maybe they then optimize on it also" (t=2026-09-27 08:06 UTC). Directive d_77667898b9 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "but ppl tell me they send also revenue events and I thought maybe they then optimize on it also". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · playful US, BE
advertiser instructed: "<@U02B1BEMBEC> I believe Playful assigns a dynamic cost per user action depending on the offer + advertiser pair, then within the cookie window which sticks to the user's txid, they add up all cost-bearing user actions and attribute them back to us in one conversion. The base install conversion from the hybrid model is related only to their own app's user cost acquisition, so they shorten the length of the cookie window to accommodate there.
Maybe a call would be simpler to answer all of your questions?" (t=2026-09-29 00:16 UTC). Directive d_b443f6a3cb is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['playful'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U02B1BEMBEC> I believe Playful assigns a dynamic cost per user action depending on the offer + advertiser pair, then w…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · traffic
advertiser instructed: "<@U02B1BEMBEC>
1. The install share of revenue is about 46% across all of our network data, with that number increasing as revshare amount per user drops.
2. Revshare postbacks generally hit our servers within the hour:
80.7% of all revenue within 1 hr
84.9% within 4 hrs
91.8% within 1 day
96.9% within 3 days
97.9% within 1 week
3. Over the last 6 months, our mean revenue per user was $2.31 (std dev is atound $3.35). Our 75th percentile is $1.62, 90th is $5.80, and 99th is around $16.53. The highest payout we’ve seen in this 6-month range was $161.
Among the 27% of revshare-paying users, revshare amounts average $4.85 per user with a standard deviation of around $4.67.
Let me know if you need a more detailed breakdown than this!" (t=2026-09-29 07:52 UTC). Directive d_5c6f1b871f is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U02B1BEMBEC> 1. The install share of revenue is about 46% across all of our network data, with that number increasing …". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — appsamurai · IT, AT
advertiser instructed: "Hey <@U0B0Y8Y37FS> :wave:
We're setting ETC up to run exactly the way you described on our kickoff call:
• *Your funnel, your control.* We'll show your reward funnel exactly as you push it through the API. Whenever you change a reward or add a rung, it updates on our wall automatically.
• *Full transparency.* You'll get a dashboard with our margin on every campaign and install day: revenue, what we paid users, completion rates and time to complete. You can tune rewards the same way you do with your other clients. We'll start at the 50% target we discussed.
• *Quality by source.* We'll pass a source ID on every click so you can see quality broken out by traffic source.
Excited to scale this with you :rocket:" (t=2026-09-29 18:54 UTC). Directive d_e2950555a0 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0B0Y8Y37FS> :wave: We're setting ETC up to run exactly the way you described on our kickoff call: • *Your funnel,…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · IT, AT
advertiser instructed: "<@U02B1BEMBEC>
1. It's possible that a user can generate a $150 conversion, but this is extremely rare.
2. We don't receive individual events per user aside from the $0 registration at the beginning of the funnel, it is a one-time revshare conversion that pools all user events from their stickied cookie window - unless the user returns to the funnel in a separate session, in which case we may receive a second conversion amount.
3. Yes, optimization is done on value/EPC. The higher the EPC, the higher quality that affiliate's traffic is." (t=2026-09-30 02:02 UTC). Directive d_0d012a62f5 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U02B1BEMBEC> 1. It's possible that a user can generate a $150 conversion, but this is extremely rare. 2. We don't rece…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · IT
Moritz Holländer instructed: "but its on user level then? because you said "it is a one-time revshare conversion that pools all user events from their stickied cookie window"" (t=2026-09-30 12:13 UTC). Directive d_53580b2afe is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "but its on user level then? because you said "it is a one-time revshare conversion that pools all user events from their…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · IT
Moritz Holländer instructed: "Hey guys we need to chargeback it" (t=2026-09-30 21:05 UTC). Directive d_88587f7a32 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
• [resolved from dashboard] no approval on cap from julia
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey guys we need to chargeback it". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · GB
advertiser instructed: "Hey <@U0AE2DJVABU> can we check on invoices #106 and #110? They are both overdue by 1-2 weeks, they were the ones that contained adjustments from the UK spend chargeback" (t=2026-10-01 22:00 UTC). Directive d_70749f2ac4 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0AE2DJVABU> can we check on invoices #106 and #110? They are both overdue by 1-2 weeks, they were the ones that c…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — appsamurai · traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hey <@U0B0Y8Y37FS> our dashboard is ready
<https://provider.easytaskcash.com/m|https://provider.easytaskcash.com>
Can you pls send me ur email and ill give u access. Theres a performance tab and margin tab that breaks down what we discussed in the call" (t=2026-10-02 16:53 UTC). Directive d_89aeaaeef6 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [dismissed — not actioned]
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0B0Y8Y37FS> our dashboard is ready <https://provider.easytaskcash.com/m|https://provider.easytaskcash.com> Can yo…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — prograd · traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hey <@U0AS0HW2X4L> can you provide billing info and finalized numbers for traffic up until the end of September so I can issue the first invoice? Thanks!" (t=2026-10-02 19:41 UTC). Directive d_f1bf35e46a is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hey <@U0AS0HW2X4L> can you provide billing info and finalized numbers for traffic up until the end of September so I can…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · US, AT
advertiser instructed: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> when you get a chance, can you take a look at the new bizop offer (digital atm) setup?
here's the login to the portal:
<https://www.jvzoo.com/newdashboard/newdashboard|jvzoo.com/newdashboard/newdashboard>
<mailto:ashley@runadvertise.com|ashley@runadvertise.com>
7B2+qxq4=e"A7c)
everflow advertiser ID: 41
they're all revshare (80%) with the base amounts posted back to us, offer IDs 969-971 i set to include duplicate conversions bc of the rebill but not sure if we should do an event instead" (t=2026-10-04 18:33 UTC). Directive d_b2261647c5 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> when you get a chance, can you take a look at the new bizop offer (digital atm) setup? here's the login t…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · empfohlen BE
advertiser instructed: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> since we're not using appsflyer cost import with reco anymore, we should still hardcode the revenue/payout values in everflow right? and empfohlen would be the 100%/100% setup" (t=2026-10-05 22:03 UTC). Directive d_922981fa1a is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['empfohlen'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "<@U09U4TK8QCW> since we're not using appsflyer cost import with reco anymore, we should still hardcode the revenue/payou…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · freecash US, IT, AT, BE
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "Hi team,
Following up on Moritz's messages from Sep 30. On Sep 29–30, traffic from your network ran through creatives and funnels that are not permitted under our Partner Advertising Policy:
• On Sep 30 at 08:57 CEST we asked you not to use any scroll angle. The same day, Mike confirmed in this channel that your publishers run a "screentime to cash" / "get paid for your screentime" angle.
• Funnels on <http://playrwd.com|playrwd.com> promised users "$1,000 to claim after completing three offers", with Freecash as one of the offers.
• The ads were also flagged publicly: <https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTok/comments/1wtyy5z/anyone_else_get_this/|reddit.com/r/TikTok/…/anyone_else_get_this>
In the same window, 53 new sub1s were launched, drove almost all of the week's volume, and stopped right after we raised the issue.
Traffic generated through prohibited claims is not payable.
**Chargeback: $141,252.50**, the full spend on these 53 sub1s, Sep 29 – Oct 4:
• `22_`: $47,342.80
• 52 new `41_` sub1s: $93,909.70
Please apply it to the invoice for Sep 28 – Oct 4. Total spend for that period is $169,266.30, so the payable amount is **$28,013.80**.
The 52 `41_` sub1s:
```
41_ohygat, 41_hwglme, 41_zldtxx, 41_burytt, 41_apgslk, 41_bxuxnq, 41_suptsp, 41_zbcgej, 41_mmxzcb, 41_rhxvqc, 41_mlndmp, 41_iyiyws, 41_nbqwpx, 41_ifdizq, 41_ybzqnl, 41_newgyu, 41_caxbvd, 41_xjjkjy, 41_gempwb, 41_llpfga, 41_dqvyxt, 41_mncfut, 41_fnvcea, 41_wpjrmj, 41_cdmsbm, 41_hevigz, 41_yvizzr, 41_mlxtwk, 41_cridzt, 41_akrsjo, 41_afjpch, 41_oxkzko, 41_wbtpmh, 41_atdxwg, 41_hmesmq, 41_polbzp, 41_mxtffg, 41_hrlqfl, 41_oddvws, 41_iwjwmt, 41_tgmrip, 41_jvfinp, 41_agnamh, 41_rgyxid, 41_awvwcs, 41_fjmfkp, 41_axfvvj, 41_dfmvph, 41_qftptg, 41_jvxlcp, 41_kcyhjh, 41_dsdwrr
```
Going forward:
• No funnels that promise users money for completing Freecash or other offers, and no screen-time / scroll angles
• New sub-publishers and sub1s need to be shared with us before they get traffic
• Please share the results of the compliance review Mike mentioned, including which publishers ran these funnels
Thanks!" (t=2026-10-06 11:20 UTC). Directive d_c4129c9f8b is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
• no global announcement found for a global stop
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi team, Following up on Moritz's messages from Sep 30. On Sep 29–30, traffic from your network ran through creatives an…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · AT
advertiser instructed: "i think their portal has the cap rates mixed up <@U09U4TK8QCW>
looking at our messages from september 1st-september 3rd we had a cap of 2500 reg
september 3rd onwards we had cap of 3500 reg with updated 7.10 rate
they're "withholding" overdrawn cap which is based off an old cap that was never updated" (t=2026-10-06 19:45 UTC). Directive d_911d441308 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "i think their portal has the cap rates mixed up <@U09U4TK8QCW> looking at our messages from september 1st-september 3rd …". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · US
advertiser instructed: "atp either prescott actually has a lower 4.5 bid or they're taking $1 margin per cv which still leaves us in a better position" (t=2026-10-06 21:40 UTC). Directive d_e87dc745d7 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "atp either prescott actually has a lower 4.5 bid or they're taking $1 margin per cv which still leaves us in a better po…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · freecash IT, AT
Julia Gorbunova instructed: "Hi Max, hi Carson,
Thanks for the detailed reply and for the evidence packet. We've checked the packet against our data: that source is active on our side, and we're addressing it with the partner concerned. We also agree with your point that this mechanism is non-compliant regardless of how the landing page is worded.
You asked for click IDs and timestamps. Here is what our position on affiliate 41 is based on:
• _41_gempwb_ · click_id `cd03140b2f21497691cb3a298d36ffcb` · signed up Sep 29, 03:06 UTC. Later that day the user wrote to our support: "TikTok sent me here but it wasn't a video ad, it said I've been chosen… it was TikTok who did it."
• _41_iyiyws_ · click_id `94680f85325e4d12a17702a97bffc467` · signed up Sep 29, 09:36 UTC. Seven minutes later: "how can I make money by scrolling on TikTok? with this app"
Both are your click IDs, so you can trace the ads and landing pages behind them.
This matches the rest of what we see:
• On Sep 30, Mike wrote: "I know it's a 'screentime to cash' angle. Just wanted to make sure screentime angle is still fine."
• Affiliate 41 had almost no Freecash traffic in the weeks before Sep 25, scaled sharply on Sep 29–30, and stopped within the hour after our message on Sep 30.
• Carson mentions that publishers running this exploit have moved their traffic to other networks. It would help to know whether affiliates 41 and 22 were among them.
For clarity, we're not relying on the Reddit screenshots or on <http://playrwd.com|playrwd.com>.
_Where we are_
• _41_ ($93,909.70):_ based on the evidence above, we're applying the chargeback. If your review or the materials for these sub1s show something different, we'll look at it again.
• _22_ ($47,342.80):_ we don't have user-level evidence here, so we're holding this amount rather than treating it as final. Please share the creatives, landing pages and TikTok ad IDs that 22_ ran on Sep 29–30 by _Oct 14_, and we'll review them.
• The payable amount for Sep 28 – Oct 4 is $28,013.80 for now.
It would also help to see affiliate 41's materials and ad IDs for the same period, and the outcome of your internal review." (t=2026-10-07 15:22 UTC). Directive d_5c92ae9bfc is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi Max, hi Carson, Thanks for the detailed reply and for the evidence packet. We've checked the packet against our data:…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U08LV0GL8G0> thank you for the update, I will speak with our publishers and see if they can get up to the 1-1.5K install cap when they resume traffic tomorrow!
Let me know also when the new quality dashboard is complete :hugging_face:" (t=2026-10-07 17:27 UTC). Directive d_c268e20e5a is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [resolved from dashboard] resolved with meeting + new actioned proposal
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Read as: resume offer(s) in traffic? Wording isn't explicit — confirm the intended action/scope before anyone acts.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — almedia · freecash US, IT, AT, BE
advertiser instructed: "We understand there is a correlation between the click ID timestamps and support ticket submissions you shared, however, provided that we ourselves saw a substantial increase in volume of these types of landing pages to _other_ networks from September 29th and days or even months prior (also cited by the Reddit articles you forwarded), and the fact that the nature of user retargeting lends itself to the same audience being repeatedly shown similar ads, it is extremely likely that these same users have been exposed to numerous instances of these uncompliant landing pages and claims before or after opting in via a funnel tied to our network. It is very reasonable that a TikTok user could have seen numerous uncompliant ad angles, eventually opted in through our compliant LPs, and created those support tickets due to a preconception of the app caused by those uncompliant angles; fully unrelated to our claims.
There is no guarantee that the language used in these support tickets are directly caused or even influenced by our traffic. With this in mind, we feel that it is very aggressive to apply a chargeback of this size solely based on this. *Can you confirm whether or not there is any definitive evidence that links the uncompliant activity in question to us?*
We have been very open and transparent with you on our compliance practices and have instituted many safeguards to ensure that our affiliates are not running noncompliant traffic for the health of your offer and the industry as a whole. Since the beginning of our relationship with you, we have promised to deliver clean, quality traffic and have enforced this policy rigorously within our network. As Carson mentioned, this has been the reason for our low volume as of recently: our affiliates are made very clear on compliance rules and regularly updated on any changes. Given how strict our procedures are, they choose to run this type of noncompliant traffic elsewhere that will accept it. We want to be abundantly clear on our position here that we take compliance extremely seriously.
To reclarify our previous point, Mike's message was to confirm the compliance of the screentime angle we observed being scaled to other networks following a spike in volume from our own affiliates, out of concern that our sources may have been utilizing the same exploit. This was the reason for the pause in traffic, and after confirming at length that our affiliates were _not_ utilizing this landing page or any noncompliant ad angles, we allowed them to resume scale. This was the same procedure that we followed with July's sudden increase in volume, as we do not want to be in a situation where affiliates are scaling noncompliant or low quality traffic without ongoing knowledge about their campaigns. Our standard protocol is to completely pause affiliates scaling if there are any concerns about compliance.
Aff 22
<https://nexvumi.com/|nexvumi.com>
Aff 41
<https://change.loom-peak.com/qztbfhgiv?loc=__PLACEMENT__&subid=sub1example&utm_campaign=sub1example&utm_content=sub3example&mc_campaign_id=__CAMPAIGN_ID__&mc_adset_name=__AID_NAME__&mc_adset_id=__AID__&mc_ad_id=__CID__&mc_pub=__PLACEMENT__&ttclid=example|change.loom-peak.com/qztbfhgiv?loc=__PLACEMENT__&subid=sub1example&…> (needs to be viewed on mobile)
<https://www.landpage-view.com/fc/english/1?mc_attr=c%3D341c2884-4d04-49e5-871e-f7c2659f5dc4..m%3Dmuyhezfeu2iddn7kzqszbd9xpr..d%3D0-0-0-0-3..l%3D17914001827..e%3Dexample..t1%3Dsub1example..t2%3Dsub3example..t3%3D__CAMPAIGN_ID__..t4%3D__AID_NAME__..t5%3D__AID__..t6%3D__CID__..t7%3D__PLACEMENT__..t8%3Dsub1example|landpage-view.com/fc/english/…/1?mc_attr=…>" (t=2026-10-08 05:17 UTC). Directive d_273ac1931d is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley + Mike (Freecash; Mike for ID 25 / Julia threads)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['freecash'] (exposure may be understated)
Exposure: $0.00
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · IT
advertiser instructed: "Maybe let's open reco traffic rev share as the main option. And for prior affs leave the opportunity with cpa, but it's really way less than it was before with these PO and cap" (t=2026-10-08 17:23 UTC). Directive d_b5cfb1cf7c is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Maybe let's open reco traffic rev share as the main option. And for prior affs leave the opportunity with cpa, but it's …". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · IT
advertiser instructed: "yeah we'll have to make that change
let's leave the 500 $4 cap for ID 209 in case he wants to run it still
everyone else will move to revshare only" (t=2026-10-08 17:53 UTC). Directive d_e3880ed73a is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "yeah we'll have to make that change let's leave the 500 $4 cap for ID 209 in case he wants to run it still everyone else…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "the nice thing about this is we can make reco a public link and stop worrying about caps/quality....." (t=2026-10-08 17:55 UTC). Directive d_290a4d0b0c is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Read as: stop offer(s) in traffic? Wording isn't explicit — confirm the intended action/scope before anyone acts.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "yuvi called me yday saying david cut him too same deal that we have" (t=2026-10-08 17:57 UTC). Directive d_aab67db053 is 'new'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Exposure: $0.00
❓ Read as: stop offer(s) in traffic? Wording isn't explicit — confirm the intended action/scope before anyone acts.
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · traffic
advertiser instructed: "We ran a few thousand in revenue to Reco through ETC. quality was terrible" (t=2026-10-08 17:58 UTC). Directive d_d32fc9eab1 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "We ran a few thousand in revenue to Reco through ETC. quality was terrible". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — advertiser · IT
advertiser instructed: "Reco revshare offer is broken, alex discovered it after running with $0 revenue. The $ values are coming in as adv5 instead of amount" (t=2026-10-09 15:42 UTC). Directive d_b914806390 is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Reco revshare offer is broken, alex discovered it after running with $0 revenue. The $ values are coming in as adv5 inst…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
MEDIUM — exmox · testerup, empfohlen traffic
advertiser instructed: "Hi <@U08LV0GL8G0>, I uploaded the cost files from our tracker's logs of Empfohlen and Testerup for August, can you please take a look and let me know if there are any issues? Thank you! :heart_hands:" (t=2026-10-09 16:37 UTC). Directive d_e73a090c7b is 'ambiguous'.
needs a team reply
Suggested responder: Ashley (account manager)
💡 Prior notes on this advertiser:
• [handled / approved] response has been made bids have been cut for 181 and 182 to $6, android is also off and link for android was paused in the early morning c
• [resolved from dashboard] US traffic has been completely paused, there is a global announcement in the announcements channel of the discord server as well as in
What proves it:
• 6 affiliate(s) with no valid pause notice: 38-lk-affiliate, 96-afftune-michal-ingier, 109-taggaffiliate-ltd, 130-affiliate, 222-affiliate, 254-affij17
Still uncertain:
• offers not mapped to Everflow: ['empfohlen'] (exposure may be understated)
• scope not yet confirmed
Exposure: $0.00
❓ This looks consequential but I couldn't resolve a concrete action (pause/stop/resume/cap). Quoted: "Hi <@U08LV0GL8G0>, I uploaded the cost files from our tracker's logs of Empfohlen and Testerup for August, can you pleas…". What action is required?
(Recommendation only — no action taken without approval.)
Recommendations only — the agent never acts without approval.